You're Promised the Honker

Chaiten Volvano

The following is not intended as a defense of Jay Caspian Kang's post on Kevin Garnett. Mr. Kang is a quite able-bodied young man and can speak for himself, in these parts or elsewhere if he should so choose, whenever he so pleases. Nor is it any sort of attack on the man they call Rough Justice, who has contributed to FD in the past and is, at There Are No Fours, a writer you should digest on a regular basis.

That said, I would like to take some of this quality 6AM airplane time to address RJ’s post from yesterday, where he lashed out at Jay’s Kevin Garnett post and raised some broader critiques of the FreeDarko way of life. Let it first be said that my feelings on Garnett-Villanueva are uncharacteristically murky. In a purely ethnographic manner, I dismissed CV’s tweet-borne outrage as “just not the way things are done.”

I wasn’t only the writer to say, in not so many words, “come on Charlie V., WE PLAYIN’ BASKETBALL!” Rather than take a moral position, I was content to relativize, or romanticize, or whatever, and say that sports are awesome and athletes, subject to more special rules than the rest of us, even when it comes to the expectation of half-decent conduct. I heard from readers who wondered why the near-rampant homophobia of sports wasn’t somehow entering this discussion; in talking with Jay, I started to think that here, Garnett was the exception that proved the rule.

There’s a lot that can be empirically, and affirmatively, chalked up to the culture of the sport. When is trangression transgressed? When, as in this case, the speech-act is both resoundingly dull and just plan mean (as in petty). The common currency, or rules of engagement, is all about drive, rancor and wit. Going too far and not going far enough are strangely intertwined.

As for Garnett himself, to call his intensity performative is by no means to discount it. If KG is one-hundred percent authentic – which, mind you, is different from sincere – out on the court, he would be almost alone in sports. Part of playing the game is playing the game, playing mind games, and any other such cliché you can call up to register the duality that is the competitive self. If you hate that sentence, just say “nature and nurture” three times fast. Garnett, like pretty much any other person looking to topple others in his field, is closed loop with no beginning or end. He wouldn’t be driven to so fastidiously project the character he does if he weren’t, on some level, really that hell-bent on succeeding. Yet as the Recluse suggests, KG’s allowing himself to be so swayed by lawless emotion is easily attribute to Jordan-era basketball socialization. From there, though, we’re right back at “but it takes the right kind to so totally embrace, and even further amplify, the lessons of MJ’s persona”.


I can quite artificially pick and choose what Garnett traits to admire, or at least enjoy -- cussing at no one in particular, banging his head on the padded goalpost, needlessly blocking shots after the whistle, barking like a dog, and slapping the floor on defense for no other reason than to fire himself up further. That John Thompson interview, the “loading up the clip” sound bite, and that dolorous adidas commercial with the stand-up comedy section, these are all pure gold to me. Yet that’s a false dichotomy. These are part and parcel with the bullying, dirty play, and complete and total loss of perspective while on the court that increasingly, have become the hallmark of Garnett’s on-court demeanor. Part of it is the move from Minny to Boston, which got Garnett out from under that all-consuming cloud of pathos and made him less eternally sympathetic and – since he was suddenly playing on a real team – eccentric. Going from feel-good super-team to brooding contenders further concretized Garnett. You just couldn’t look at him any more as a powerful, twisted curiosity. He was out on center stage, and then after 2008, a professional who didn’t care to leave room for our indulgences. Getting older didn’t help, either.

That’s to say, I neither quite agree with Jay, nor with the part of me that could once be brought to tears by a 2002 shot of Garnett guarding Webber. Before, Garnett was an extreme version of competition with no object. Once he got a taste of its applications – the only role that would ever make sense for him, long-term – he changed, but our perception changed, too. The KG of Minnesota was a parable, a folk hero, a creative act that drew in athlete and fan alike to create mythology. He was perfect for the purposes of this website, but I can’t pretend he wasn’t kind of a dick all along, or that the way he looks in this second act somehow stands apart from the earlier KG. What I’m learning now is that I’m stuck with both, and that they’re actually one and the same.

Much of Rough Justice’s post was directed at Jay; I may have indirectly addressed them, but the point here isn’t to rush to the aid of the last thing published on this site. What really interests me is RJ’s assertion that liberated fandom and team faithfulness are not mutually exclusive. To this I say, duh. To be perfectly honest about it, the “manifesto” in our first book did the concept of liberated fandom a great disservice. I was only barely responsible for it; it was put together by forces beyond my control, and I was too busy to complain that it tacked way too extreme for my part. Plus, I heard it would help sell books.

On this blog, I have never suggested that liberated fandom meant players over teams, or that pure aesthetics are all that is to be gleaned from basketball. What excites me about basketball is that, at its best, a team is not only the sum of individuals – it has nearly the same amount of personality. Furthermore, winning is always a question of aesthetics, and aesthetics employed primarily in the service of winning. It’s the interplay between these two poles that, to me, exemplifies the NBA. And while I’ve always scoffed at being chained to a single team, especially when players shift around so much, I’ve always taken it as license to have a rooting interesting in a bunch, with one or two sometimes elevating themselves above all others. Granted, oftentimes my more casual interest in a team is a function of a player or two, but for what it’s worth, I’ve always been known to turn my back on individual players. In short, liberated fandom is more like free love than a weird fetish, or unlimited free porn downloads.


That’s all I have to say on the subject for now. There is precious little rock in my iTunes. I have some thoughts on legacy that I’ve been meaning to get up for a while now, so let’s so how bored I get on this next flight. The television isn’t working on here but I wasn’t expecting it in the first place.

Labels: , , , ,


At 11/07/2010 7:40 PM, Blogger C Johnston said...

The main problem with Jay's post is that its thesis is incompatible with the rest of its logic. Garnett is, on the one hand, someone too stupid (or at least lacking the intelligence of a Kobe or an MJ) to know how his interactions with reporters and players will be perceived by others. Yet, he is also some sort of clever mastermind who is crafting an image of himself as competitive; his theatrics are just that: acting. Thus, KG has relied on acting tough to deal with his own insecurities. These ideas do not mix. KG may be insecure, but his persona is not crafted. Get serious. Watch the interview. I can agree that what KG did was severely distasteful, but I've played sports and been on both ends of distasteful action before. To assume that action is the sole barometer for ethical behavior is silly. Intention (for winning, loyalty, etc.) must also be considered. While Garnett may act like an asshole, I am fully convinced that he does so out of an intention to be the best (player, teammate). As a competitive person myself, how can I blame him? Jay clearly doesn't like KG, and that's fine. We are all entitled to our own opinions. But his attack of KG's character based on his ferocity on the court is misplaced and misguided. Jay doesn't really understand Garnett, which is fine. But he therefore shouldn't be the one to write the definitive post on Garnett.

At 11/07/2010 8:38 PM, Blogger Matt said...

My analysis is much less in depth and thought out but to me KG is just John McEnroe. He 'performs' to hype himself up and play better. Is it bullying and unattractive - at times definitely. Is it effective now and has it always been - absolutely. Look at McEnroe's legacy - he is still considered one of the greatest even if he was always an Ahole on the tennis court. I think Shoals is right in that KG has always acted this way but under the championship/major franchise spotlight we are all more aware of it and the outcome of his actions actually have a bearing over important games. Just like MJ, Kobe and the rest KG is ultra competitive and will do whatever he can to fire himself and his teammates up. I actually find it refreshing that he is honest enough (and maybe not smart enought) not to sugar coat his interviews abou it most of the time.
For good and for bad he wears his heart on his sleeve. Anyone who has ever played a pick-up game in a playground can see where he is coming from.

At 11/07/2010 9:54 PM, Blogger Zak said...

Thanks for restoring sanity (and/or fear) to this discussion. The non-contradiction between aesthetics and loyalty is really the crux here. "Liberated fandom" or whatever you want to call it is an aestheticization of sports, but since sports (team sports, anyway) are as much about Place, and Identity, and Tradition, and so on, as they are about Guys Running Really Fast and Jumping Really High and Making Really Cool Plays, you can't really deal with the aesthetics of sport without taking fandom and loyalty seriously.

This is what you guys usually do pretty well here - and it's also the basis for most of the current sports writing I enjoy, in which I'd include The Run of Play, and even Simmons

At 11/07/2010 10:03 PM, Blogger spanish bombs said...

My favorite part of RJ's post was how he talked so much about the opening paragraphs of Jay's post. I skipped every paragraph of Jay's post that wasn't about basketball!

However, I think the contrarian nature of his piece makes me think he has a future working for Slate!

At 11/07/2010 11:17 PM, Blogger RT said...

So I went to wikipedia to look up Yinka Dare, the youtube highlight mix-master, but there was no disambiguation. That's a shame. Guy should have a wikipedia page.

At 11/08/2010 4:11 AM, Blogger djbtak said...

you can't really deal with the aesthetics of sport without taking fandom and loyalty seriously

I'd argue the opposite, fandom and loyalty are specific kinds of aesthetics, particular structures for managing experience. I think a part of what FD is trying to do is to make those structures something that can be investigated, rather than just given.

As for Jay's post, much of the discussion reminds me of the anglo-analytic / continental philosophy wars. Like he's saying "Something's up with this, what's this rupture about?" and then there are a whole bunch of people piling on with "You can't prove there's any rupture, KG's totally consistent! Just listen to what he says!" Reminds me of the Far Side cartoon where the guy with a paintbrush is standing outside his house, having painted "door" on the door, "dog" on the dog, "tree" on the tree etc. Caption is "Right, THAT should sort out a few things around here."

At 11/12/2010 12:57 PM, Blogger Andrew said...

Unrelated, but is Shoefly going to do a post regarding Pacquaio/Margarito? Would love to hear his take.

At 6/23/2012 9:07 PM, Blogger mark b said...

Thanks for your great post.I like this very much,Black PC Dell Inspiron i560-5383NBK Desktop (Piano Black),jerseys with numbers,Pocket Watches,camera and photo,The best notebook,Graphic cards,price of a netbook,headphone earbud,the best backpacks,laptop bag and cases,MP3 Downloads,Finding a Ring,collar shirts for men,Batu Akik Kecubung,Calculator for graphing,Accounting software programs,Mouse cordless optical,Price for mp3 player,Glove Oven,smoothies blenders,Golf Bags,PC tablet prices,software for audio editing,commercial arbitration,short love poems and quote,car covercraft,healthy organic food,

At 6/23/2012 9:08 PM, Blogger mark b said...

this post is goodBusiness based at home,motorcycle,otomotif,lg cell phones,cell phone battery,walkie talkie talk,cheap dvd portable player,antenna for wifi,Asas Hukum,antenna for wifi,screen protector for monit,battery for a laptop,a leather wallet,android cell phone,prepaid cell phones,cell phone cases,Flash memori card,jenis Akik,solar lamps for garden,pump with filter,flip flops sandals,fragrance for men,women fragrances perfume,Movie this year,universal cell phone battery charger,

At 6/14/2013 6:06 PM, Blogger Jim Philips said...

It looks quite impressive that smoke column. Those are the phenoms that we would like to check close at Hostpph community.


Post a Comment

<< Home